Showing posts with label Waste. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Waste. Show all posts

Thursday, April 23, 2015

Disposition before acquisition --- please consider

What does your shopping list look like? Whether its clothes or groceries or furniture and furnishings, the motto should be Consider Disposition before Acquisition.  

In short, as we make a decision to purchase we should be considering what to do with all the stuff we acquire after we have finished with it?

What do we really need?

On the shopping list on the left, all that is necessary is the fruit and vegetables.  And as for that category, there can be a great deal of culling if we grow our own.

I am a renter and so have my limitations with gardening. Almost all of it is done in pots - and I have a wide definition of what is a pot.  Irrespective of size or what it is made of, it is surprising what can be a pot. In my yard, I have the sort of pots one buys at Bunnings, old saucepans and pots, a watering can, pallets lined with weed matting, storage jars, storage crates, a Woolworths shopping basket, and there are the pots I 'acquire' - from others' throw aways  mostly.

I love a good forage among my herbs and veges in preparation for the evening meal.  And I don't stop at what is in the pots.  You see, I take an interest in edible weeds - particularly dock and plantain.

And if I have fruit and vegetable waste?  That's easy - a no brainer, in fact.  Things like onion peels and citrus skins and crushed eggshells go in the compost (and I add, through the compost's life span, stuff like lime and blood and bone to my compost). The other stuff - the vegetable peels, skins, cores etc - go into my busy farm of red wriggler worms who convert the stuff into worm poo and worm juice which goes back to the garden.

This way my food waste becomes beneficial
and part of an on-going cycle of life and death.



Thursday, April 16, 2015

Oceans: Plastic, our waste, is killing turtles


Monday, April 13, 2015

Thursday, February 12, 2015

Compost produces an elegant beauty

Cross-posted with The Trad Pad

My compost bin is, at the moment, half full. I sometimes leave the lid off to catch a bit of rain.  On my last visit to the bin, this is what I found.

My friend Alida said:  They're very pretty, but I do suggest your compost needs more nitrogenous material so bacteria grow as well. This seems to have too much carbohydrate in it. Add manures if you can, or fresh green waste. And turn it.

I said no to the manure.  A couple of inches below these beautiful things is a couple of inches of horse manure.  I did say yes to the turning. Will see to that.

My friend, Denis, of The Nature of Robertson has identified the fungi for me.  The elegant black and white mushrooms are Coprinus calyptratus.  The small white hooded ones are the young of the species.






Monday, August 4, 2014

Art, Waste and Consumption

How Abstract Art Can Change The Way You See Waste And Consumption In America

If you're a human being who goes on the internet or wanders outdoors from time to time, you know this is a precarious time for planet Earth. While often the message is delivered in the forms of alarming headlines or dire infographics, we rarely see a call for conservation that looks as beautiful as this:
brian

Brian Belott, Clooz
This colorful abstract image isn't your typical illustration of consumption and waste, but the mixed media assemblage of reused materials certainly strikes a chord. It offers no scolding, no morals, no parting principles. But something about the image sticks -- a suggestion of waste's beauty, of its potential and ours.
'Posted: Updated: 

Monday, February 25, 2013

Bring A Bag Campaigns have to become widely implemented as entry to public events

Pictures on this post are by Ian Hall. 
Ian holds the copyright of these photographs. 
They are published here with his permission.

On Saturday night, Ian Hall and I were in Melbourne's eastern suburbs for a friend's wedding.  After the reception, somewhere about midnight, we went to bed setting the alarm for 3am.  You see, Gleaners, we wanted to get into the city to catch White Night which was operating from 7pm to 7am.  

No vehicular traffic was entering the Melbourne CBD but trams were running all night.  We drove in and parked in the university precinct and caught the No. 19 (North Coburg) tram into the CBD.  Even though the crowd numbers at that hour were well down on the quoted 300,000, the transformed city was a wonder to see.  Familiar buildings were transformed beyond what our daily imagination could have conjured up.  Creativity was released.  Music, performers, artists, craftspeople, puppeteers.

However, there was something very thoughtless and unattractive on what was left behind - massive quantities of rubbish and detritus.

The sort of demographic which flocked to White Night, I think, would have responded positively to a poll asking their attitude to matters environmental.  I am sure the majority of people would have been enthusiasts expressing great love and concern for their environment.  The major flaw is that love and concern was not demonstrated on the streets of the Melbourne CBD on Saturday night 23 February 2013.






I don't want to hold only the individuals comprising the crowd accountable.  The council of the City of Melbourne did not have its collective thinking cap on.  Did any of the leadership of the City of Melbourne consider the ramifications of 300,000 people coming to town - and a lot of them staying for at least 12 hours?!

Not to worry - that international corporate, SPOTLESS, was there to pick up the pieces. 

I suspect this rubbish might have remained unsorted and unrecycled and may well have been dumped into landfill.  

A possible solution?
  • What if all those who came into the CBD had to pass through checkpoints - entry only if you could produce two bags - one for recyclables and one for other stuff? 
  • What if large bin points were strategically located for people to dump their rubbish thoughtfully before they went home?  
  • What if the police - who, when we saw them, were standing around bored stiff - were empowered to issue on the spot fines for littering? 
  • And what if Spotless were only needed to pick up the dump bins regularly and take them to a spot at which they could be thoughtfully recycled or otherwise disposed?  
  • What if these massive CBD crowd scenes were to become admired gatherings for their environmental care? 
Our society, it seems to me, has not got past an out of sight, out of mind attitude to waste disposal.  We seem to think that if we clean it all up, take it away, dispose of it or dump it where we can't be reminded of it, we are acting appropriately.

Every item, no matter how small, that we waste, throw away, dispose of goes somewhere on our planet.  Waste does not dissolve or get eliminated simply because we cannot see it and have left where it used to be clean.  

Above all waste costs.  It costs at the front end where there seems to be little awareness of whether packaging is necessary or kept to a minimum.  When we purchase a product the waste is included in the price.  At the back end, the cost of cleaning, recycling, disposing, and even dumping has a price.  The price is included in the rates charges of local authorities which finds its way back into front end product costs.  

Shocking costs are often inflicted on individuals and families where it hurts the most - on their bodies through illness, and on the biggest financial investment of most families - their houses and lands. These, the worst costs, are often delayed like a time bomb.  Cranbourne residents were greatly shocked, inconvenienced, and out of pocket when their local municipality allowed their homes to be built on landfill.  

Technology does fix some things but not all things.  Recycling ability is being extended constantly - but it costs. Local Authorities, by and large, have not given up on dumping in landfill - and those cheap take-your-frig-away services when you buy a new refrigerator are often a guarantee of your frig with all its gases and chemicals being tipped into a landfill somewhere to become a hazard on time delay.

We have to ask our local council and our state and federal governments to become care-fully focussed on waste at every level and every part of our daily lives.
  1. What is the waste policy of your local council?
  2. What councillors on your local authority are interested in development and what councillors will lend a sympathetic ear to a conversation on waste, its cost, its disposal?
  3. Where is your waste currently going? Waste disposal does not end at the local council's Transfer Station.
  4. If your local council is currently using landfill, what are its plans for closing all landfill and finding other methods for waste disposal?
  5. How is your local council transferring its waste disposal costs to business, government, and landholders in your local authority area?
  6. If you live in a local authority with significant rural land holdings and an agricultural/pastoral economy, what are the local landholders doing?  They frequently have their own landfill in which all sorts of things can end up.  Yet with the constant expansion of our cities and suburbs, that land often ends up in the hands of the developers to become suburban housing and business development.  Again, another slowly ticking hazardous bomb that we can't get our heads around because we are under the illusion that we have plenty of space to place things out of sight and out of mind.
In all these considerations, we must consider the air that we breathe, the water that we drink, and the land that grows our food.  In short, a cavalier attitude to waste in which we chuck without thought can affect the basic elements of life on this plant - air, water, food.  We must become forces of stimulation and collaboration for those who govern us and who take on community responsibility.  We cannot force business and government to take on responsible, thought-full and care-full policies if we fail to take our own individual responsibility.

All this requires more thoughtful conversation 
matched by thoughtful actions 
than we are managing at the moment.  


Tuesday, February 19, 2013

The Klean-Up Kid in his Akubra is on to it



The picture and story are taken from
from Ballarat's daily newspaper The Courier.
Please take a few minutes to dip into our great newspaper.

YOUNG, budding wildlife warrior Ashley Straga has launched a campaign to help save the ducks at Lake Esmond – and the five-year-old has called on some big names to help.
Ashley has met Clean Up Australia chairman and founder Ian Kiernan and City of Ballarat mayor John Burt to register his own Clean Up Australia Day site.
He was equipped with an Akubra, just like Kiernan’s, and an official T-shirt for his mission.
Summer trips to the lake sparked Ashley’s concern when he noticed increased picnic rubbish and cans lying about that could harm nearby ducks. 
So he asked his mum to join the Clean Up Australia Day campaign. Ashley’s mum Sarah Straga was proud of her son, but this latest venture had not come as a surprise.
“I accredit it all to Steve Irwin. He never did the Wiggles or Play School. It’s all been Steve Irwin documentaries,” Ms Straga said. He doesn’t know how to tie shoe laces but he can do a top-jaw rope on a crocodile.
“He picks up rubbish on his own accord and makes me lug it around wherever we go. I don’t mind. I encourage the initiative.”
Ms Straga hoped to join a clean-up group but when finding Lake Esmond was not a registered site, took on the job of site manager.
Family, friends and Ashley’s new school community at St James Parish Primary School have all pitched in to help, working the clean-up in with the school’s sustainability programs.
For all the clean-up work Ashley does in the community, Ms Straga still has to make sure he remembers to clean his room.Ashley says he wants to be like Steve Irwin and will visit the Irwins’ Australia Zoo for his birthday later this year.
An estimated 3.029 tonnes of rubbish were collected on Clean Up Australia Day in Victoria last year.

Monday, February 18, 2013

STOP THE TOSS - STOP WASTING FOOD - FEED THE WORLD

Waste is a world wide issue.
 Food waste is arguably THE major waste issue. 
 Not only does wasting food waste human energy, water, and nutrients,
 it can cost human lives.


Tuesday, July 24, 2012

London, The Olympics and how it has managed or mismanaged waste


The article below is from Let's Recycle

Olympic waste legacy opportunity ‘missed’

23 July 2012
By Amy North
The organisers of London 2012 are unlikely to achieve a zero waste legacy in East London due to a low level of engagement with organisations outside of the Olympic Park, according to a new report.
The report ‘Towards a One Planet Olympics Revisited’ was published by sustainability charity BioRegional and the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) on Thursday (July 19). It analyses the Olympic Delivery Authority’s (ODA) and the London Organising Committee of the Olympic Games’ (LOCOG) progress again targets laid out in the London 2012 sustainability strategy, which was published in 2005.
The report notes that the reuse and recycling targets for the demolition and building phases of the Olympic Park 'substantially exceeded' targets
The report notes that the reuse and recycling targets for the demolition and building phases of the Olympic Park 'substantially exceeded' targets
And, while it claims that reuse and recycling targets for the demolition and building phases of the project have been ‘substantially exceeded’ it states that the legacy targets will not be met in time for the Games or even after they have finished.
In particular, it points to a low level of engagement with reuse and other organisations outside of the Olympic Park as well as a focus on recycling rather than reuse during the building phase.
The report states: “On the one hand, there has been a huge success in delivering against an ambitious waste strategy; all the core targets are either achieved or on track. On the other hand the wider opportunity, and stated ambition, to be a catalyst for far wider changes has been missed.”

Legacy

In the original strategy five legacy targets were laid out. These were:
  • Zero waste policies extend across East London based on high recycling rates and residual waste converted to compost and renewable energy;
  • Increased market for recycled products;
  • Training and job opportunities locally in (re)manufacturing;
  • Local and sustainable materials supply chains maintained, and;
  • A ’green’ business hub.
Commenting on whether the targets will be met, the report states: “We are not confident that any of these promises will be met, certainly not in time for the Games, or in legacy. What all these have in common is that they relate to activities happening outside of the Olympic Park and would have required a higher level of engagement with local reuse networks and other appropriate organisations. Whilst the challenge in delivering this cannot be underestimated, the huge scale and manpower of London 2012 could and should have made better progress.”
"On the one hand, there has been a huge success in delivering against an ambitious waste strategy; all the core targets are either achieved or on track. On the other hand the wider opportunity, and stated ambition, to be a catalyst for far wider changes has been missed."
- BioRegional and WWF
As an example of a missed opportunity the report cites social enterprise BioRegional’s experience working on site to support a reclamation approach to demolition.
Whilst a high level of recycling was achieved, the report notes that “some of this came at the expense of the reuse rate of less than 1%; considerably below industry best practice. Having a joint target (reuse and recycling) did not reinforce adopting the waste hierarchy, hence the simpler and more controllable options of recycling and recovery took precendence.”
LOCOG has previously been criticised by council leaders who said it could have done more to reduce waste in the run up to the Games (see letsrecycle.com story).

Progress

Looking at achievements within the Olympic park, the report notes that ODA exceeded it 90% reuse and recycling target for the demolition and building phase, with 98.5% of demolition waste recycled and 99% of building waste recycled.
The report said the ODA’s success was due to a number of actions including its work with contractors and waste companies to enable recycling to take place as well as a procurement system that considered material type and building methods, helping to reduce the amount of waste arising.
Elsewhere the authors note that LOCOG’s actions to date to achieve zero waste directly to landfill “demonstrate a genuine intention to try and deliver this challenging target”. This includes its work with Coca-Cola to create a consumer-facing campaign which includes recycling bins and a custom-made mobile recycling vehicle and working with Heineken to develop a new recyclable plastic bottle which can be included in the recycling bins at Olympic venues.
The report states that LOCOG’s game-time Zero Waste Games Vision is an “exemplary blueprint for other event organisers to follow” as it demonstrates the importance of engaging with people throughout the supply chain.

Sustainability

In addition to waste and recycling, the report also looks at climate change, biodiversity, healthy living and culture and heritage. Notably it highlights a failure to meet the renewable energy targets set out in the original bid.
Commenting on the report, Sue Riddlestone, BioRegional’s executive director who was involved writing in the original strategy, said: “London 2012 has set the sustainability bar for future Summer Olympics. It has built venues which set the standard for energy saving and embodied carbon. We are proud to have been part of setting the vision for London 2012 and helping deliver it.
“That said with over-consumption of resources driving rapid environmental degradation, London 2012 should have pushed sustainability more and had a stronger focus on changes beyond the Olympic Park. It is important that lessons are learned and that a commitment to sustainability is a key criterion by which the 2020 Summer Olympics bids are judged.”

Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, April 18, 2012

Gold from garbage - some seem to be getting it right


Environment: Getting Gold From Garbage – 
How Some Are Making Waste A Resource
Source: European Commission
Published Tuesday, April 17, 2012 - 10:36


Top performing Member States have recycling rates of up to 70 % and bury virtually nothing, whilst others still landfill more than three-quarters of their waste. How have the best performers turned waste from a problem into a resource? A new report from the European Commission today explains that it is by combining economic instruments. A mix of landfilling and incineration taxes and bans, producer responsibility schemes and pay-as-you-throw prove to be the most effective tools in shifting waste streams to more sustainable paths.. If the EU is to meet the objectives set out in the Resource Efficiency Roadmap – zero landfilling, maximising recycling and reuse, and limiting energy recovery to non recyclable waste – these economic instruments will need to be introduced more widely across all Member States.

Environment Commissioner Janez Potočnik said: "Waste is too valuable to just throw away, and if you manage it right you can put that value back into the economy. Six Member States now combine virtually zero landfilling and high recycling rates. Not only do they exploit the value of the waste, they have created thriving industries and many jobs in the process. This report shows how they achieved it: by making prevention, reuse and recycling more economically attractive through a selection of economic instruments. We now have a common responsibility with the Member States and local authorities to ensure that these instruments are effectively used and spread across the EU. This is one of the central goals of the Resource Efficiency Roadmap."
Experience in the Member States shows that a combination of the following instruments is the best way to improve waste management:
Landfill and incineration taxes and/or bans – the results of the study are unequivocal: landfilling and incineration rates have decreased in countries where bans or taxes have driven up costs for landfilling and incineration.
"Pay-as-you-throw" schemes have proved very efficient in preventing waste generation and encouraging citizens to participate in separate waste collection.
Producer responsibility schemes have allowed several Member States to gather and redistribute the funds necessary to improve separate collection and recycling. But cost-efficiency and transparency vary greatly between Member States and between waste streams, so these schemes need careful planning and monitoring.
Significant differences between Member States
There are significant differences in waste management between Member States. According to a Report published by Eurostat on 27 March (see STAT/12/48), the most advanced six Member States - Belgium, Denmark, Germany, Austria, Sweden and The Netherlands - landfill less than 3 % of their municipal waste. At the other extreme, 9 Member States are still landfilling more than 75 % of their municipal waste. Recent statistics published by Eurostat show continuous progress in some new Member States, where recycling rates are increasing rapidly. Municipal waste generation has also decreased in several Member States probably due to the economic downturn.
Economic Instruments needed to reach EU objectives
Replicating these instruments in all Member States will be necessary if the EU is to meet the targets set out in its waste legislation and its targets for resource efficiency. This is why the possibility of making their use legally binding in some cases will be assessed in a 2014 review of EU waste targets. The Commission is also including sound waste management in conditions for receiving certain European funds (see IP/11/1159 and MEMO/11/663).
Waste is good business
Meanwhile the Commission is encouraging Member States to implement existing waste legislation more effectively. Waste management and recycling industries in the EU had a turnover of € 145 billion in 2008, representing around 2 million jobs. Full compliance with EU waste policy could create an additional extra 400 000 jobs within the EU and an extra annual turnover of € 42 billion (see IP/12/18). Improved waste management would contribute to achieving several objectives and targets of the Europe 2020 Strategy for smart sustainable and inclusive growth.
More information
The report and detailed results for each Member State:
ESTAT Report on municipal waste management:
STAT/12/48
Study on macroeconomic modelling of sustainable development and the links between the economy and the environment:


Enhanced by Zemanta

Sunday, January 15, 2012

Handling the garbage down Mexico way


Mexico City is twice the size of Melbourne. And it is having problem with its garbage.  The powers that be have recently closed one of the world's largest landfills.  This has brought about illegal dumping of garbage - by the garbage collectors themselves!

Now rubbish is no respecter of persons: the poor, the rich, the intellectuals, and the dumb-bums all make waste and have garbage to dispose of so rubbish is being dumped in some of the posher suburbs of MC.

And it is not only Mexico City that is having problems.  Bogota (with a population 2.5 times the size of Melbourne) and Buenos Aires (half the size of Melbourne) are having problems.  Read more about this here.

To find out what is happening on the continent of South America, please look at the document below. 

Saturday, January 14, 2012

Recycling and Trucks


You might like to pop over to Thomas Hayden's blog, The Last Word on Nothing, and read his post which is titled Trash, Recycling, and the Heartbreaking Lessons of YouTube Ethnography.  And for those of you who are keen on garbage/rubbish trucks you might like to pop over here.

Saturday, December 3, 2011

Cooking Oil to Fuel Western Water Vehicles

Water may be its core business, but now Western Water has turned its attention to a different liquid – biodiesel fuel. The water authority has installed a new 13,000 litre biodiesel tank at the Sunbury depot, to help reduce its carbon emissions.

"Using biodiesel for all our fleet vehicles will reduce carbon emissions by more than 140 tonnes a year,” Western Water’s Managing Director, John Wilkinson, says. “The biodiesel is produced from local waste products such as used cooking oil and tallow, which would otherwise go to landfill,” he says. “This means we are not only reducing carbon emissions from our fleet, we are also putting a waste resource to good use.”

The $25,000 tank is the largest of three now installed by Western Water, with tanks already in place at depots in Gisborne and Melton. The move is part of Western Water’s Climate Change Strategy, which sets a goal of zero net carbon emissions by 2017-18.

“We have already reduced our emissions by almost 30 per cent since 2004-05, and are now aiming to hit 50 per cent by the middle of next year,” Mr Wilkinson says. “Other measures have included retro-fitting energy efficient technology at offices, depots and recycled water plants, and converting to green power,” he says.
“At the Melton Recycled Water Plant, we are capturing biogas produced in the water recycling process to generate 100 per cent renewable electricity.”

BTW, pop over here to read a warning to Sunbury and Macedon Ranges residents on the need for more water saving.

Monday, November 21, 2011

Acquisition and Disposal: the twin peaks of waste, dumping and disposal


This is the BIG QUESTION!
Has your local council satisfactorily resolved 
the Hard Rubbish/Hard Waste on the Footpath issue, yet?


Yarra City Council is home to many environmentally conscious citizens and they display this consciousness with some success at the ballot box. I am sure the Council would consider itself pro-active.

Generally speaking, Councils - and I can only speak from my Melbourne experience - have gone from something like twice-yearly general hard waste collections - put it on the footpath and they will come, between the stipulated dates. - to a "book it, put it on the footpath with a sticker, between the stipulated dates" system.  Councils have gone from a general zonal system to an individualised site specific system complete with mailout and printed sticker



I'm not sure how Councils expect this way of doing things to be cheaper and effective -
and there's a Councillor at Yarra who says it's certainly not cheaper.


To be fair, Councils are between a rock and a hard place on this issue....
  1. It makes sense to give householders regular opportunities to relieve themselves of large items of waste.  No system at all means back to the bad old days and ways - fridges in creeks, mattresses under bridges and so on.
  2. Under the zonal general pick-up system, Councils believed gleaners were an issue leaving footpaths messier than just the original site.
  3. Councils believed gleaners should be deterred and brought in new laws accordingly. Word soon spread (on my advice not justifiable in law) that once hard waste is on the footpath it is then Council property and for gleaners to remove it means that they are stealing and major fines are attached!
Here let me declare my interest.  Miss Eagle is a gleaner and there are few circumstances in which she doesn't glean.  In the long, long ago, before Councils had heard of hard waste on footpaths, I would seek out auction sales, garage sales, second hand shops.  In fact, my first port of call is the hard rubbish on the footpath.  I do admit once that 'Booked' sign goes up, I really do think twice about taking stuff. Some householders are getting too clever by half and tie up items for disposal with rope in such an in-and-out zig-zaggy way that it can be a bit difficult to remove a likely piece.

There are the householders at the other end of the continuum.  They put out big mobs of stuff on the footpath, don't put a 'Booked' sticker on it - or may long after the event. There it is open to everyone and open to rain, hail or shine. Perhaps they think they are being generous to gleaners - and that may be. 

However, all rubbish is not equal. 
Some is grotty, horrible stuff which should be in plastic bags in a rubbish bin.

The reason this blog came into existence is because I am thoroughly cheesed off by what I have seen in my gleaning.  As I have already said, grot is put out which should be in a plastic bag and put in the standard rubbish pick up.  Some is recyclable and could go in the blue (or whatever your recycling colour is) bin.  Above all, so many in my neighbourhood are only five minutes or less away from the Salvos and Vinnies and don't seem to be bothered to take appropriate stuff there.

I don't want to appear an ungrateful gleaner but a few facts have to be remembered at the gleaning end:
  1. Just as all rubbish is not equal, all gleaners are not.
  2. Some gleaners break and pull things apart and generally make a mess as they fossick and glean.
  3. Some, like me, are the opposite. We try to place things back as they were. We deliberately set out NOT to make a mess.
  4. Where the householder is around, permission is asked.
  5. People glean for different things. I once met a man with a ute and a disability collecting metal to sell to a scrap-metal dealer.  This was to eke out his disability pension.  I glean houshold and gardening items.  I have been renovating furniture for forty years.  I have a good eye for making useful, even beautiful, what others reject.  This gift has been passed on to my children and my daughter has passed it on to her partner.  What I seek the metal collector will pass by and vice versa.
  6. There are professionals. My daughter met last year the owner of a well-known antique shop in a well-heeled suburb as he was gleaning too. He explained that the second hand section accessed by a separate entrance at the rear of the antique shop had seen his business through many a lean year.  And why not? Small business faces continual pressures and hardships that Wall Street and Reserve Banks don't recognize nor do they understand.   
So how does all this get sorted out?

Firstly, we have to realise that rubbish will always be with us and will never be entirely eliminated. Aboriginal midden heaps of great antiquity are still with us and some are  protected by government.
Secondly, we have to realise that gleaners will always be with us and will never be entirely eliminated. I jokingly say that we gleaners are the third oldest profession - after the first two unmentionable ones. We are mentioned in the bible
It is suggested that most gleaners are women. I would modify this statement because in very poor populations across the word, the gleaners are often children.
So we have two irresistible forces. We have rubbish - far too much of it.  We have gleaners - but probably not in sufficient numbers to spirit the waste off Melbourne's footpaths.

We have health factors to consider.

I think that, to deal effectively and cheaply with disposal of rubbish, we have to focus on the diminution of rubbish and waste.  We are already making inroads at the household level so that we can say with a degree of certainty that there is a good level of understanding about recycling.  This comes at the disposal end.  What we lack is a satisfactory level of understanding about acquisition.  

Acquisition is a behaviour that dares not speak its name.
Acquisition provides a lot of business.
Acquisition provides a lot of jobs.

Public education programs are needed so that people consider acquisition and its impact. 
 More stuff,more storage, more storage, more outgoings, 
more outgoings, more credit, more credit more interest, 
more interest less savings, less savings less superannuation....
PLEASE CONSIDER!